• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Ci Logo

Climate Interactive

  • About
    • About
    • Staff
    • En-ROADS Ambassadors
    • Partners & Funders
    • Press
    • Job Openings
  • Tools
    • Simulation Models
      • En-ROADS
      • C-ROADS
      • ALPS
    • Workshops & Games
      • The En-ROADS Climate Workshop
      • Climate Action Simulation Game
      • World Climate Simulation Game
      • Agritopia
    • Other Tools
      • Green Equitable Transformation
      • Tools for Virtual Engagement
      • FLOWER
      • The En-ROADS Guided Assignment
  • Topics
    • Multisolving
      • Green Equitable Transformation
      • Practices & Tools
      • Articles
      • Applied Examples
    • Climate Analysis
      • The Climate Scoreboard
      • Simulation Models
      • Workshops & Games
    • Food Systems
      • ALPS
      • Agritopia
    • Systems Thinking
      • The Climate Leader
      • COVID-19, Climate Change, and Equity
  • Get Involved
    • Events
      • Join an Event
      • Run an event
      • Webinars & Trainings
    • Media
      • Blog
      • Videos
      • Press
    • Contribute
      • Volunteer Program
      • Donate
      • Job Openings
  • Support
  • About
  • Staff
  • En-ROADS Ambassadors
  • Partners & Funders
  • Press
  • Job Openings
  • Simulation Models
    • En-ROADS
    • C-ROADS
    • ALPS
  • Workshops & Games
    • The En-ROADS Climate Workshop
    • Climate Action Simulation Game
    • World Climate Simulation Game
    • Agritopia
  • Other Tools
    • Green Equitable Transformation
    • Tools for Virtual Engagement
    • FLOWER
    • The En-ROADS Guided Assignment
  • Multisolving
    • Green Equitable Transformation
    • Practices & Tools
    • Articles
    • Applied Examples
  • Climate Analysis
    • The Climate Scoreboard
    • Simulation Models
    • Workshops & Games
  • Food Systems
    • ALPS
    • Agritopia
  • Systems Thinking
    • COVID-19, Climate Change, and Equity
    • The Climate Leader
  • Events
    • Join an Event
    • Run an Event
    • Webinars & Trainings
  • Media
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Press
  • Contribute
    • Volunteer Program
    • Donate
    • Job Openings

Emissions Gap Exists, We Can Close It, says Dr. Elizabeth Sawin and 32 other Scientists

November 24, 2010 By Drew Jones

What’s the latest on the sufficiency of country mitigation pledges to the UN? Now Dr. Beth Sawin of Climate Interactive and 32 other top global scientists have spoken in the UNEP “Emissions Gap Report”. Watch yesterday’s webinar briefing on the work below:

The key conclusions of the study are:

  • There is a gap between where we would like to be and where we are heading;
  • The size of the gap depends on what happens in the negotiations;
  • The options on the table now in the negotiations have the potential to reduce emissions by 7 GtCO2e versus what would have happened otherwise (business-as-usual);
  • This can be achieved by realizing countries’ highest ambitions and ensuring “strict” rules result from the negotiations;
  • It is feasible to bridge the remaining gap through more ambitious domestic actions, some of which could be supported by international climate finance; and
  • With or without a gap, current studies indicate that steep emission reductions are needed post-2020 to meet temperature targets.

Some background to the work:In mid-2010 the UN Environment Programme, the European Climate Foundation, and the National Institute of Ecology in Mexico convened 33 scientists from 25 different research groups, including Climate Interactive’s Beth Sawin to begin an assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions reductions pledges in the Copenhagen Accord relative to the goals limiting long-term temperature increase to 2.0°C (3.6°F) or 1.5°C (2.7°F).

The approach taken in the assessment involved:

  • Identifying emissions pathways consistent with the two temperature limits;
  • Compiling the estimates of emissions under the Copenhagen Accord from the nine different research groups (including Climate Interactive) who had made such estimates; and
  • Calculating the gap between between where emissions seem to be heading under the Copenhagen Accord pledges and where they would need to be to achieve the temperature limits of 1.5°C or 2.0°C.

The UNEP website contains additional details including a technical summary with additional modeling detail on the modeling approaches used and the country by country pledge analysis.

You may also be interested in Climate Interactive’s analysis of current pledges, the Climate Scoreboard.

Climate Interactive’s work on this report has been supported by Zennström Philanthropies, the ClimateWorks Foundation, the Foundation for Global Communities, the Morgan Family Foundation, and others. And key partners include MIT Sloan and Ventana Systems, who built C-ROADS with Climate Interactive.

Primary Sidebar

Blog

Categories

  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Business Focus
  • C-ROADS
  • En-ROADS
  • Examples of Multisolving
  • Featured
  • Food Systems
  • Media coverage
  • Multisolving
  • Multisolving in Action
  • Multisolving Leaders
  • Policy workshops and games
  • Project news
  • Systems Thinking Insights
  • Team & Community
  • Uncategorized
  • World Climate Simulation

Footer

  • Explore
    • Home
    • Updates
    • Tools
  • Connect
    • Support
    • Contact
    • FAQ
  • Get Involved
    • Training Program
    • Join an Event
    • Donate
Social Media
FacebookLinkedInTwitterYouTube

    Get Updates

    I accept having my information collected.* Privacy Policy.

    ⟶
    • Languages
    • Español
    • Português
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    Climate Interactive
    • © 2021 Climate Interactive
    • Privacy Policy